News

The judiciary of Myanmar's military junta is expanding the case against the Nobel Peace Prize winner. You face up to 160 years in prison. In Myanmar, the judiciary has brought five further charges of alleged corruption against Prime Minister Aung San Suu Kyi, who was ousted in a military coup. This was reported by several media, citing sources familiar with the court case. Overall, the 76-year-old is now confronted with eleven charges. Ten of these involve violations of an anti-corruption law. According to the information, she faces up to 160 years in prison. At the beginning of the week, the Nobel Peace Prize winner was sentenced to four years in prison for importing a radio and violating corona regulations. She had previously been found guilty of two other charges at the beginning of December and initially also sentenced to four years in prison.  An "unidentified projectile A few hours later, however, the military junta announced that the sentence would be reduced to two yea

A court has sentenced the disempowered Prime Minister of Myanmar, Aung San Suu Kyi, to four more years in prison. Among other things, it is about the possession of radios. Myanmar's disempowered Prime Minister Aung San Suu Kyi has been sentenced to four years in prison by a court. The 76-year-old was found guilty in two cases of illegal import and possession of walkie-talkies and in one case of violating corona regulations, according to a judicial officer. In connection with the radio equipment, she is said to have disregarded telecommunications and import-export laws. The special court in the capital Naypyidaw had postponed the verdicts against the Nobel Peace Prize laureate several times. It is unclear whether Suu Kyi will have to serve a prison sentence or remain under house arrest. The process took place in camera. Ukraine Conflict: Helpless Between The Powers At the beginning of December, she had already been sentenced to four years in prison for inciting rioting against the

On Monday it will be announced, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. One hears again and again that it can only be awarded for the mRNA vaccination. After all, it is she who shows mankind a way out of the corona pandemic. But who should get the award? Did Paul Krieg and Doug Melton, who made artificial messenger RNA in the laboratory in 1984, deserve it? Robert Malone, who in 1987 mixed mRNA with fat molecules and bathed cells in them? The cells convert the gene code into proteins. Should the award be given to Eli Gilboa, who activated immune cells against tumors with mRNA? Their clinical use failed, but inspired other researchers. For example, Ingmar Hoerr: In 2000, the Tübingen man used mRNA to induce a stable immune response in mice. Are Uğur Şahin and Özlem Türeci, the founders of BioNTech, worthy of the award? In a few months you brought an effective vaccine against Covid-19 onto the market and have just received the Paul Ehrlich and Ludwig Darmstaedter Prize with your colle